In 1975, the Environmental Protection Agency had an issue. Not an existential risk, just like the company faces at present, however an issue nonetheless. The EPA—nonetheless younger on the time—was a large number. Graphically talking, anyway.
“There was no standardization at all,” says Tom Geismar, a graphic designer finest identified for his position in crafting logos for NBC, Mobil, Chase Bank, and finally the EPA. In the mid ‘70s, the agency’s 9 subdivisions operated independently of each other, and their printed supplies—brochures, letterheads, experiences, and the like—lacked a way of uniformity. The solely factor unifying the company’s documentation was its emblem, a tricolored daisy. But the image had its personal drawback: The colours made it costly to print.
They would possibly sound trivial, however these graphical hangups had been losing tens of millions of presidency yearly. The company couldn’t purchase paper in bulk, and practically every bit of printed design was made out of scratch by employed designers. “People were spending a lot of money on this stuff,” Geismar says. Which is why in 1975, the federal government tapped Geismar and his colleagues on the design studio Chermayeff & Geismar (now Chermayeff & Geismar & Haviv) to alter that. The consequence was the 1977 EPA Standards Manual, an 84-page booklet that defined, in exact element, how the EPA may streamline its graphic identification to economize and current a extra cohesive identification to the general public.
At the time, the e book supplied a sensible, engaging resolution to overspending. Forty years later, it represents one thing extra aspirational. “This is just one more example of the care and quality that was put into a federal program that we rarely see today,” says graphic designer Jesse Reed. Reed is the co-founder of Standards Manual, the publishing imprint that’s revived the visible tips for NASA, MTA, and America’s bicentennial. Now Standards Manual is elevating cash to provide the EPA e book a reboot, as a technique to showcase how good design can remedy actual issues (a portion of the proceeds will go to Earthjustice).
As a bit of graphic design ephemera, the guide is difficult to beat. It’s full of colourful renderings and summary patterns. It appears to be like extra like an artwork e book than a authorities doc. “It’s not just decoration, it’s actually functional,” says Steff Geissbuhler, who labored on the guide again within the ‘70s. Geissbuhler simplified the daisy emblem and coloured it a single shade of blue. He additionally created a system to delineate between the assorted departments. Geissbuhler assigned every program a colour—“toxic red,” “noise yellow,” “solid waste brown.” He additionally gave every an abstracted sample meant for instance phrases like “water” “noise,” and “radiation.” When mixed with the EPA’s simplified emblem, these parts leant every program an individualized look whereas sustaining total unity. “For a government, this was very expressive graphic design,” says Hamish Smyth, Reed’s co-founder at Standards Manual.
When the EPA requirements had been produced within the ‘70s, high-design manuals were fairly typical. A few years before Geissbuhler and co worked on the EPA manual, Nixon started the National Endowments of the Arts, which spurred a program called the Federal Graphics Improvement Program. Like the name suggests, the program was a national effort to improve the graphic design across the federal government. During this period, agencies hired top-tier designers to rework their identities and streamline their graphics (NASA’s worm emblem got here out of the identical program). “People were starting to become aware of the need for more design consistency and coherence,” says Courtney Spearman, a design specialist on the NEA.
As it turned out, the EPA solely used the guide for just a few years. In 1981 President Reagan appointed Anne Gorsuch (mom to Supreme Court justice Neil Gorsuch) to supervise the company. Upon arrival, Gorsuch demanded that she get her tricolored daisy again and did not implement the guide’s guidelines. “The whole system somewhat came unraveled at that point,” Geismar recollects.
Strangely, if you happen to navigate to the EPA’s web site at present, you’ll nonetheless see CGH’s minimalist emblem within the left hand nook, however that’s the extent of the guide’s legacy. The present set of tips are relegated to a plain webpage filled with textual content that does little to pay homage to the efforts of 40 years in the past. “It’s a total disaster,” Geissbuhler says. He’s proper. The graphic design is horrible. But given the present state of the EPA it’s arduous to not really feel like his evaluation is poignant in additional methods than one.
Go Back to Top. Skip To: Start of Article.